With talks between the grocery workers union and Southern
California's major supermarket chains dragging on, the union
is trying to gain some leverage by reaching out to
consumers.
The United Food and Commercial Workers and
other labor groups held a rally yesterday in Kearny Mesa and
embarked on a door-to-door campaign designed to educate
customers on the issues behind the contract negotiations.
Mickey Kasparian, who heads Local 135 of
the UFCW in San Diego and Imperial counties, said the
outreach efforts are part of the union's plan to increase
pressure on the companies.
“We are continuing to take these steps so
we can have as much leverage as we can at the bargaining
table,” he said.
The UFCW and the three supermarket chains
– Albertsons, Ralphs and Vons – have been negotiating on and
off since January but have yet to come up with a new
contract. The previous one was reached after a 4½-month
strike and lockout three years ago.
It's unclear whether the union's outreach
efforts will help pressure the chains into making
concessions, said George Whalin, president of Retail
Management Consultants in San Marcos.
Unlike in the past when unions had more
pull, he said, today's consumer is more concerned with
convenience than with the plight of the workers.
By and large most Americans aren't that
sympathetic,” he said. “Everyone lives their own lives and
does their own thing.”
Adena Tessler, the spokeswoman for the
three grocery store chains, said the rallies are patently
unproductive.
“The companies are really disappointed
that the union is continuing this kind of activity,” she
said. “All this is going to do is frighten the employees and
alarm consumers.”
Yesterday, a couple hundred union
supporters gathered outside an Albertsons in Kearny Mesa
chanting “Kids' health, not employers' wealth” to underscore
a key point of contention between the two sides – health
care and a two-tier wage system.
Similar events are scheduled for
communities throughout Southern California.
Sara Dupuy, who has worked at Albertsons
for 30 years, said the public must learn that grocery
workers haven't had a raise in more than five years,
forgoing those pay increases for better health benefits.
“These companies need to understand that
we need the health benefits,” she said. “They think they can
just dump on us like Wal-Mart.”
Dupuy said customers supported the grocery
union during the strike three years ago and she expects that
they will support the union again once they understand the
issues more throughly.
“If they (the supermarkets) didn't learn
it last time, they'll learn it this time,” she said. “The
customers really came through for us.”
Harley Shaiken, a professor at the
University of California Berkeley who specializes in labor,
said the issues that grocery workers face – affordable
health care and job security – resonate with the public at
large.
“What the union is doing is saying, 'If we
better our conditions, you get better service and you just
might have a model that pulls up your salary and your
benefits,” he said.
While Whalin was unsure whether the
union's efforts would sway many consumers, he said that so
far the union has done a better job than the companies of
getting its message across.
He said the grocery chains need to
emphasize the cost pressures they face.
“The economic reality is competitive, and
all other types of forces have led to certain jobs paying
less than they used to and that's certainly the case with
the food business,” he said.
Still, no matter who wins the current
public relations war, he said any good will either side
might have curried would be gone if another strike occurs.
“Consumers would be upset,” he said. “But
they'd be upset with everybody.”
Kent Wong, director of the UCLA Center for
Labor Research and Education, said that with negotiations at
an impasse, the union needs to try a number of strategies.
“Right now it is hard to see what's going
to be the tipping point,” he said.