

July 3, 2007
Supermarket Swindle: Grocery Workers' Labor Fight Is the Subject of New
Documentary
By Joshua Holland, AlterNet
Southern California grocery workers are poised for another
round in their long and bitter battle with the three mega-chains -- Kroger,
SuperValu and Safeway -- that dominate the market. Four years ago, ownership
locked them out during a nasty contract dispute that dragged on for almost
five months.
This time, their struggle will be televised -- by Brave
News Films, the production company behind Wal-Mart: the High Costs of Low
Prices. "When we learned that 20,000 California children had lost their
health coverage under the contract the grocery workers agreed to in 2004, it
made us angry in a very basic way," said Director Robert Greenwald. "As
members of the community that care about these workers, we wanted to tell
the story of their fight in human terms," he told reporters Monday. The
result is a new film, Supermarket Swindle. Click on the image to the
right to view a video clip. (Disclosure: Greenwald sits on the board of the
Independent Media Institute, AlterNet's parent organization.)
The stories the film tells are increasingly common in the
vaunted "new economy." The grocery workers say that they haven't had a raise
in five years, and fewer and fewer have access to employer-paid healthcare
and pensions. According to a study by researchers at UC Berkeley, 94 percent
of grocery workers had employer-funded healthcare before the 2003 lock-out,
but only 54 percent enjoy that coverage today. Owners claim they're feeling
the squeeze from discount chains like Wal-Mart, which has moved into the
grocery business with its heavily promoted and controversial "Supercenters"
in the last two decades.
But if management is being squeezed, it's not showing up
on their balance sheets, which are looking as healthy as ever. Nonetheless,
workers are being asked to make concessions on pay and benefits so that the
grocery chains can remain "competitive." They're the only ones being asked
to tighten their belts; while the average employee at the three chains made
$497 per week in 2006, the CEOs -- David Dillon of Kroger Supermarkets,
Albertson's Jeff Noodle and Safeway's Steve Burd -- each pulled in an
average of $174,068 per week.
At the end of June, more than 95 percent of the United
Food and Commercial Workers' (UFCW) members in Southern California voted to
authorize a strike if it becomes necessary. Negotiations continue, and both
sides say they hope to avert a walkout if possible.
But the Golden State's grocery workers have little reason
to believe management is bargaining in good faith. During the lock-out four
years ago, the supermarkets' ownership group mounted a concerted attempt to
break the union. Before the old contract even expired, they had hired
thousands of replacement workers -- "scabs" -- flying some in from
neighboring states. The owners locked out the grocery workers for 142 days
in an attempt to make the union suffer for refusing a contract that called
for dramatic reductions in employer contributions to workers' healthcare
funds. The owners also tried to drive a wedge between older union workers
and new hires by instituting a two-tiered pay scale that slashed earnings
for less experienced workers and provided a powerful incentive for
management to get rid of more experienced workers earning higher pay rates.
Even more dangerous in terms of the precedent it might
have set was the grocery giants' push to deny affordable healthcare to
California's grocery workers. The supermarkets argued that the healthcare
concessions they sought were small, but an independent analysis by Richard
Brown and Richard Kronick, two scholars at the University of California,
concluded that the plan would have effectively spelled an end to affordable
health coverage for California's grocers. "There is more to the employers'
proposal than they have publicly acknowledged," they wrote, "and the
proposal bodes ill for supermarket workers and, if adopted more widely,
workers in other sectors."
In the end, the unions were able to fend off the worst of
what management had proposed, but at a great cost. They ended up with a
two-tiered pay scale and gave concessions on health benefits. While
management lost an estimated $1.5 billion during the lock-out -- and the
good will of many shoppers -- most analysts agreed that they came out on
top.
Ken Jacobs, director of the Center for Labor Research and
Education at UC Berkeley, wrote that fewer than one in ten grocery workers
hired since the new contract took effect in April 2004 have healthcare
covered through their employer. Half are uninsured, and the rest are covered
through a parent or spouse's plan or are recipients of public programs for
the poor.
Now, negotiations on a new contract have been going on for
more than six months with little progress. The workers' contract expired
more than three months ago. "The negotiations were stuttering and now
they're completely stalled," Harley Shaiken, a labor expert at UC Berkeley,
told Reuters. He said the vote to authorize the strike was "meant to restart
the negotiations in a serious way." Both sides appear reluctant to pull the
trigger and cause a work stoppage after the acrimony of the 2003 lockout.
Labor experts consider this the most important fight since
the UPS strike in 1997. Greenwald's new film might help people undertsand
that these are not "labor" issues -- they are issues of human dignity and
fundamental economic fairness that are everyone's fight. The 2003 lockout
may well have succeeded in breaking the unions if not for the vital support
of the community. According to UFCW estimates, "From the first day on,
customers refused to cross the lines, with an average of 75% of customers
shopping elsewhere. ..." Maybe this time, management will see the wisdom of
offering employees a fair contract.
You can help Califronia's grocery workers. Visit Brave New
Film's new site, Supermarket Swindle, and pledge not to shop at the Big
Three's stores if they lock out their workers again.
|